IF I HEAR ONE MORE PERSON OR MEDIA OUTLET MOURN THE STEUBENVILLE RAPISTS’ GUILTY VERDICT FOR “RUINING THEIR YOUNG LIVES” I AM GOING TO VOMIT OR SET MYSELF ON FIRE OR BOTH
RAPISTS
ARE NOT
VICTIMS
STOP
DEFENDING
THEM
STOP
STOP
STTTTAAHHHHOPPPPPSDIOFS:FOIO:JEO:IJIOS:OIJ:DIO:JFIOS:GODDAMNIT
Yup.
Source: lacigreen
First, a story.
So, my first semester of my freshman year of college, I took this Intro to Women’s Studies class. The class met for five hours a week, one two hour session and one three hour session, and the breakdown of students was what I eventually discovered to be the typical…
I don’t tumblr enough or I would have reblogged this earlier.
Source: gyzym
When people say that evolutionary theory (or, excitement of excitements, big bang theory) don’t have “testable hypotheses”…
Okay, I’m reblogging this now because it’ll be easier to find on my tumblr than on Pinterest, since the Pinterest copy is lower resolution.
(via killiaaaan)
Source: ronracer
I’m not religious at all, but in a metaphorical way I pray for a world where nobody has to pray for a living wage.
Or pray at all, I guess.
—David Dubal, excerpted from the pianist’s recent article “Let’s Tickle the Ivories” inThe New Criterion
~Susan Leem, associate producer
(via beingblog)
(via hellomoment)
Homeopathy is a sham. Once the prevailing body of scientific evidence demonstrates that something has no medicinal value, we should really disallow it to be sold as having medicinal value, unless significant clinical evidence shows cause to reconsider.
Simply:
1. If something is shown not to be effective by a large body of well-researched scientific evidence, you should not be allowed to market it to the general public as being effective at all.
2. This should only change if, at some later point, a very large body of well-researched scientific evidence demonstrates that the original conclusion was wrong.
